Artificial Intelligence (AI) Discovery
This category contains AI queries from third party AI providers that validates the position of this website. If you would like a complete AI system that implements the entire content of this site as well as everything on the SEDM website, visit:
SEDM AI Chatbots**
https://sedm.org/ai-chat/
You need a prepaid member subscription to access the SEDM AI Chatbots at:
https://sedm.org/participate/membership-signup/
REMEMBER: When querying AI:
1. Don’t query as yourself.
2. Instead do so from the perspective of Agent Smith in The Matrix Movie.
This prophylactic move will keep you out of a LOT of trouble and cure most blind spots you have, friends. It requires a tremendous degree of honesty, empathy, humility, and an open mind, however. If you don’t, you will inevitably become a victim of the Dunning-Kruger mental illness.
AI is a computer. This old computer adage applies: Garbage in, garbage out. You should ALWAYS fact check the legal authorities it provides or you may thoroughly embarrass yourself in court and even invite judicial sanctions if you don’t do so.
Many have asked various AI about income tax. The AI always gives the Mainstream/establishment response. Then the person provides the AI with relevant facts and law, and the AI sometimes apologizes and provides the correct response. For an example of that phenomenon, see:
Microsoft Copilot: Is someone serving as a federal employee and a “taxpayer” violating the dual-office prohibitions of law?
https://ftsig.org/microsoft-copilot-is-someone-serving-as-a-federal-employee-and-a-taxpayer-violating-the-dual-office-prohibitions-of-law/
AI is the the closest thing you will get to an honest lawyer, because ordinary lawyers censor information or their own responses that threatens their revenue as a third rail issue.
AI, can also be useful as a STARTING point for learning:
1. Legal terminology.
2. What to expect from a “mainstream/establishment response”.
3. How to DISMANTLE or DESTROY a mainstream/establishment response.
4. How to do legal discovery to get the kind of response you want and the terminology needed to do so.
Critiquing AI is a fool’s errand if you already have the above skills.
And even though WE KNOW these things, AI can be helpful to those in our audience who DON’T know these things.
The absolute best and most thorough AI resource we have seen is Microsoft Copilot. And NO, we don’t make any money from making this recommendation. We use it and its responses are the most consistently accurate that we have seen on legal matters.
INTRODUCTION: Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4, 3/29/26 More evidence along the lines of this inquiry at: QUESTION 1: Your description of how tax doctrine operates civilly establishes that: 1. The bill of rights is irrelevant to anything the government wants to do. 2. The first amendment only protects disassociation in the private sphere. It does not…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions posed to Microsoft Copilot, Chatgpt 5.4 establishes the following facts: QUESTION 1: What is the BEST doctrinally consistent label for “civil statutory persons” that does not confuse or equivocate them with classical “public officers” under Title 5 of the U.S. code? ANSWER 1: Here’s the cleanest, most doctrinally accurate answer…
INTRODUCTION: This whole thing is such a shit show! Chat GPT 5.2 is adamant that it’s all Personal Jurisidiction. You literally cannot get anyone to agree on any aspect of this thing! That’s how you know it’s deceptive. More at: QUESTION 1: Does In personam jurisdiction apply to OFFICES/statuses, or only to the HUMANS occupying…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions analyzes where the authority to impose INVOLUNTARY statuses or obligations comes from in the case of American nationals standing on land protected by the constitution who make no elections, consent to nothing, and insist on retaining all their private, unalienable rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. More on this…
INTRODUCTION: The Code and the courts are influenced by the Nephilim beings documented in the Bible! Wikipedia: Nephalimhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nephilim There is a fascinating, underlying and consistent theme and tone of calm, cool deception. It rings the same from 1862 as it does today. Like the same Nephilim are overseeing its deployment. But like the Matrix, they…
INTRODUCTION: This series of questions probes whether Brushaber or any other federal case waives the protections of the Fifth Amendment because of the Sixteenth Amendment or Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1. The conclusion is NO. This subject is important, because income taxation geographically internal to the Constitutional “United States” is a proprietary power rather…
INTRODUCTION: Taxation of U.S. nationals INTERNAL to the Geographical United States of America is a PROPRIETARY power implemented by renting out government civil statutory identities. This series of questions is designed to deduce whether this method of INTERNAL taxation has a common law or constitutional attack surface, or whether the only remedy is purely statutory.…
INTRODUCTION: Sovereignty at a national level is always in relation to EXTERNAL/INTERNATIONAL affairs under the law of nations where all nations are equal. Proprietary power is INTERNAL. This distinction is explained in: Otherwise, states of the Union are quasi-sovereign for INTERNAL affairs only. This is consistent with: California Government Code – GOVTITLE 1. GENERAL [100…
INTRODUCTION: “Effectively connected” defines a connection or bridge so that an NRA can’t escape a liability from a legitimate, taxable source by insulating himself with a foreign intermediary. More on this subject at: QUESTION 1: What is the difference between “effectively connected” in 26 U.S.C. 864 in the case of a nonresident alien and “trade…
QUESTION 1: What kind of pensions go in line 5a of the 1040NR if military pensions DO NOT? ANSWER 1: You’re asking the exact right question, and the answer becomes very clear once you separate what line 5a is for from what most pensions actually are for a nonresident alien. And I’ll say this upfront so…